Skip to content
    Head to head

    FXIFY vs Funded Trading Plus: Compared Rule by Rule for 2026

    FXIFY and Funded Trading Plus are both UK-linked forex props with reputations for rule predictability. FXIFY leans on configurable add-ons; FTP keeps its rule set deliberately narrow.

    Side-by-side comparison

    RuleFXIFYFunded Trading Plus
    MarketsForex, Indices, Metals, Crypto, OilForex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
    Audited variants93
    Evaluation1, 2 or 3-Step1-Step, 2-Step, Instant Funding
    Account sizes$2.5K to $400K$5K to $200K
    Fee (100K)~$489~$549 (2-Step)
    Profit split75 to 90% (100% on 2-Phase Classic)80% to 100% (scales)
    Max drawdown6 to 10% (configurable)6 to 8%
    Drawdown typeStaticStatic
    Daily loss4%4%
    Consistency ruleNone on standard35% (Classic challenge)
    Min trading days0 with add-on, 3 default3
    Payout speed24 hours1 to 3 days
    Payout frequencyOn-demand from day 1Weekly / Biweekly
    News tradingAllowedAllowed
    EAs / botsAllowedAllowed
    Weekend holdingAllowedAllowed
    Scaling cap$4M$5M
    US tradersYes (most products)Yes
    Trustpilot4.4 (6,800+)4.4 (5,000+)
    Value score8581

    Verdict

    Pick FXIFY if you want configurability and on-demand payouts. Pick Funded Trading Plus if a narrower, more predictable rule set matters more than customisation.

    FXIFY strengths

    Fully configurable challenge, on-demand payouts from day one, no consistency rule on standard, UK-based

    FXIFY weaknesses

    Add-on pricing can balloon the entry fee, newer firm without long payout track record, no futures

    Funded Trading Plus strengths

    Weekly payouts, scaling to $5M, up to 100% split, London HQ, instant funding option

    Funded Trading Plus weaknesses

    Tighter drawdown (4%/6%), higher fees for instant funding, some model complexity

    Other matchups