Skip to content
    Head to head

    FTMO vs FXIFY: Compared Rule by Rule for 2026

    FTMO and FXIFY are the two most-compared forex props at opposite ends of the rule-strictness axis. FTMO ships a single, tight evaluation product; FXIFY sells nearly every challenge parameter as a configurable option.

    Side-by-side comparison

    RuleFTMOFXIFY
    MarketsForex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, StocksForex, Indices, Metals, Crypto, Oil
    Audited variants29
    Evaluation1-Step or 2-Step1, 2 or 3-Step
    Account sizes"0K to $200K$2.5K to $400K
    Fee (100K)€540~$489
    Profit split80 to 90%75 to 90% (100% on 2-Phase Classic)
    Max drawdown10%6 to 10% (configurable)
    Drawdown typeStaticStatic
    Daily loss5%4%
    Consistency ruleNoneNone on standard
    Min trading days40 with add-on, 3 default
    Payout speed~8 hours to 1 day24 hours
    Payout frequencyBi-weekly / MonthlyOn-demand from day 1
    News tradingRestricted on funded accounts (2-min window)Allowed
    EAs / botsAllowed with restrictionsAllowed
    Weekend holdingSwing account onlyAllowed
    Scaling cap$2M (no $400K tier)$4M
    US tradersVia FTMO US / OANDA onlyYes (most products)
    Trustpilot4.8 (29,000+)4.4 (6,800+)
    Value score9285

    Verdict

    Pick FTMO if you want the industry benchmark for track record and a single well-understood ruleset. Pick FXIFY if you want per-purchase configurability and on-demand payouts.

    FTMO strengths

    Longest track record, $200M+ paid, static drawdown, no consistency rule

    FTMO weaknesses

    $400K scaling cap, no futures, news restrictions on funded accounts, US traders via FTMO US only

    FXIFY strengths

    Fully configurable challenge, on-demand payouts from day one, no consistency rule on standard, UK-based

    FXIFY weaknesses

    Add-on pricing can balloon the entry fee, newer firm without long payout track record, no futures

    Other matchups