Blue Guardian vs FXIFY: Compared Rule by Rule for 2026
Blue Guardian and FXIFY take opposite philosophical approaches to the same forex prop category. Blue Guardian keeps the rule set deliberately minimal: static drawdown, no consistency rule, single profit target. FXIFY exposes nearly every variable as a configurable option.
Side-by-side comparison
| Rule | Blue Guardian | FXIFY |
|---|---|---|
| Markets | Forex, Indices, Metals, Crypto, Oil | Forex, Indices, Metals, Crypto, Oil |
| Audited variants | 10 | 9 |
| Evaluation | Instant, 1/2/3-Step, Futures | 1, 2 or 3-Step |
| Account sizes | $5K to $200K | $2.5K to $400K |
| Fee (100K) | ~$535 | ~$489 |
| Profit split | 85 to 90% | 75 to 90% (100% on 2-Phase Classic) |
| Max drawdown | 6 to 10% | 6 to 10% (configurable) |
| Drawdown type | Trailing | Static |
| Daily loss | 4% | 4% |
| Consistency rule | 20 to 40% (varies by model) | None on standard |
| Min trading days | 3 | 0 with add-on, 3 default |
| Payout speed | 1 to 3 days | 24 hours |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly | On-demand from day 1 |
| News trading | Allowed | Allowed |
| EAs / bots | Allowed | Allowed |
| Weekend holding | Allowed | Allowed |
| Scaling cap | $2M | $4M |
| US traders | Yes | Yes (most products) |
| Trustpilot | 3.6 (4,200+) | 4.4 (6,800+) |
| Value score | 73 | 85 |
Verdict
Pick Blue Guardian if you want the simplest possible rule set and a Canada-based jurisdiction. Pick FXIFY if you value configurability and on-demand payouts from day one, and you do not mind navigating add-on pricing.
Blue Guardian strengths
No consistency rule, static drawdown, Canada-based, simple rule structure
Blue Guardian weaknesses
Tighter 8% drawdown than industry standard, no futures, smaller payout track record
FXIFY strengths
Fully configurable challenge, on-demand payouts from day one, no consistency rule on standard, UK-based
FXIFY weaknesses
Add-on pricing can balloon the entry fee, newer firm without long payout track record, no futures