Prop Firms With Static Drawdown
Static drawdown locks the maximum loss at the starting balance regardless of how profitable the account becomes. It is the trader-friendly model and the one most experienced traders prefer.
Most forex firms run static, most futures firms run trailing. The distinction matters because trailing models punish equity-curve volatility even when the strategy is net positive. Static drawdown turns "do not lose ten percent" into a fixed line that never moves, which makes position sizing and stop placement a clean math problem rather than a moving target.
Goat Funded Trader
Saint Lucia · Founded 2023
No consistency rule, no time limit, static drawdown, wide platform choice
Blue Guardian
Toronto, Canada · Founded 2022
No consistency rule, static drawdown, Canada-based, simple rule structure
E8 Markets
Dallas, TX / Prague, CZ · Founded 2021
Fully configurable parameters, multi asset coverage, on demand payouts
Funded Trading Plus
London, UK · Founded 2021
Weekly payouts, capital scaling, split add-on, London HQ, instant funding option
Alpha Capital Group
London, UK · Founded 2021
On demand payouts, static drawdown, no consistency rule, simple fixed split
Also browse
Frequently asked questions
Is static drawdown easier than trailing?
Mechanically yes. The same strategy inside the same percentage drawdown is easier to maintain under static rules because each new equity high does not tighten the floor. The trade-off is that static-drawdown firms often charge slightly more upfront.
Why do futures firms prefer trailing?
Trailing caps the firm exposure once the trader is profitable. Combined with the buffer-and-lock structure most futures firms use, the trailing rule effectively becomes static once a payout threshold is reached.
Are there hybrid drawdown models?
Yes, a few firms run intraday trailing during sessions but lock the floor end-of-day. This is friendlier than pure intraday trailing but stricter than static. See the firm pages for the exact mechanic.