Skip to content
    Head to head

    Topstep vs Apex Trader Funding: Compared Rule by Rule for 2026

    Topstep and Apex are the two most-searched futures prop firms in 2026. The comparison usually splits on cost model and whether a live-market pathway matters. Topstep charges monthly; Apex charges once per activation.

    At 100K: Topstep from $99/month, Apex Trader Funding from $59.

    Side-by-side comparison

    RuleTopstepApex Trader Funding
    MarketsFutures (CME)Futures (CME)
    Watchlist on watchlist on watchlist
    Evaluation1-Step (Combine)1-Step
    Account sizes$50K, $100K, $150K$25K, $50K, $100K, $150K
    Fee (100K)$99/month$59
    Profit split90%100%
    Max drawdown (100K)$3,000$3,000
    Drawdown typeEnd-of-day trailingIntraday trailing
    Daily loss (100K)n/an/a
    Consistency rule55%n/a
    Min trading daysn/a1
    First payout3 days5 days
    News tradingAllowedAllowed
    EAs / botsAllowed (limited)Allowed
    Weekend holdingNot allowedNot allowed
    US tradersYesYes
    TrustpilotTrustpilot profileTrustpilot profile

    Verdict

    Pick Topstep if the live-funded pathway and fourteen-year track record justify the subscription. Pick Apex if a one-time fee, larger accounts and multi-account scaling fit your plan better.

    Heads up: Topstep and Apex Trader Funding have announced model changes in the past 90 days. We re-audit watchlisted firms every 7 days; double-check the live rules page before purchasing.

    Topstep strengths

    14 year track record, live funded account pathway, breakeven drawdown lock

    Topstep weaknesses

    Monthly subscription model, tightest drawdown in industry, slower monthly payouts

    Apex Trader Funding strengths

    Flat profit split, one-time eval fee, large funded account base, simplified rule set

    Apex Trader Funding weaknesses

    Trailing drawdown, capped payouts per PA, monthly PA fee, ongoing Riot v. Apex litigation

    Other matchups